From Lessons to Leadership:
Cybersecurity Insights from 2025 to Power Your 2026 Strategy
2025 was a watershed year for cybersecurity in the legal sector. Law firms faced unprecedented challenges: supply chain compromises, AI-driven phishing campaigns, and a surge in ransomware targeting sensitive client data. Regulatory bodies tightened requirements, with ABA guidelines gaining traction and GDPR enforcement cases making headlines. Two market shifts stood out: an uptick in law firm clients requiring SOC 2 compliance as a condition for engagement, and Beazley’s exit from the cyber insurance market, which disrupted coverage availability and drove premium volatility.
These developments underscore the urgency for legal organizations to adopt proactive, “left of boom” strategies. In 2026, firms must prioritize governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) initiatives, accelerate zero trust adoption, and prepare for SOC 2 audits. Additionally, insurance strategies need reevaluation to mitigate gaps left by Beazley’s departure. This article explores lessons learned from 2025 and offers actionable recommendations for 2026, equipping legal professionals to lead with resilience and confidence.
Introduction
2025 reminded us that cybersecurity is no longer a back-office concern—it’s a boardroom imperative. Legal organizations, custodians of highly sensitive data, became prime targets for sophisticated threat actors. The year’s events reinforced a critical truth: waiting for the boom (when an incident begins) is costly. To thrive in 2026, firms must act decisively, embedding security into governance and operational frameworks.
Lesson Learned from 2025 & Recommendation for 2026
Lesson Learned from 2025: Supply Chain Vulnerabilities
Breaches originating from third-party providers exposed client data and disrupted operations. Many firms lacked real-time visibility into vendor security posture.
Recommendation for 2026:
Implement automated vendor risk scoring and continuous monitoring. Require vendors to meet minimum security standards and include termination rights in contracts.
- Create a Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) Policy with reviews annually, at a minimum
- Includes roles and responsibilities
- Includes maintaining an inventory of vendors
- Includes categorizing vendors based on data access
- Includes maintaining a vetting process for any potential new vendors
- Create a TPRM Process that will be executed annually:
- Process for evaluating vendors based on their level of access
- Process to vet any potential vendors
Lesson Learned from 2025: AI-Driven Threats
Threat actors leveraged generative AI for phishing and impersonation attacks, bypassing traditional detection.
Recommendation for 2026:
Deploy AI-driven threat detection tools—but with governance.
- Validate models for bias and accuracy
- Integrate human oversight for critical decisions
- Establish an AI Governance Policy to define acceptable use and monitoring, and review policy annually, at a minimum
Lesson Learned from 2025: Ransomware Surge
Legal data became a lucrative target, with attackers exploiting weak MFA and legacy systems.
Recommendation for 2026:
Accelerate zero trust adoption.
- Enforce MFA everywhere
- Get on the path to passwordless authentication
- Segment networks and implement least-privilege access
- Conduct quarterly penetration tests to validate controls
Lesson Learned from 2025: Regulatory Tightening
ABA guidelines gained traction, GDPR enforcement cases highlighted penalties, and SEC rules increased breach disclosure pressure.
Recommendation for 2026:
Align policies with NIST CSF, CIS, and ABA standards.
- Conduct quarterly compliance audits
- Prepare for evolving privacy laws, including state-level regulations and the EU AI Act
- Maintain a compliance calendar for all regulatory obligations
Lesson Learned from 2025: SOC 2 Demand
Clients increasingly required law firms to achieve and maintain SOC 2 compliance as a condition for engagement.
Recommendation for 2026:
Begin SOC 2 readiness now.
- Map controls to Trust Services Criteria
- Remediate gaps early
- Schedule audits well in advance to avoid client friction
- Assign a SOC 2 Program Owner and define responsibilities
Lesson Learned from 2025: Insurance Disruption
Beazley’s exit from the cyber insurance market drove premium volatility and widened exclusions.
Recommendation for 2026:
Reassess insurance strategy.
- Diversify carriers
- Review exclusions carefully
- Explore captive insurance options to mitigate market risk
- Conduct annual insurance gap analysis at least 6 months before renewal time
What This Means for You
Cybersecurity is now a client service differentiator. SOC 2 compliance signals trustworthiness, while robust insurance coverage ensures resilience. Inaction risks reputational damage, regulatory penalties, and financial loss.
Actionable Recommendations
- Update incident response playbooks and conduct quarterly tabletop exercises
- Audit vendor contracts for cybersecurity clauses and termination rights
- Align with NIST CSF, CIS, ABA guidelines, and SOC 2 requirements
- Reassess cyber insurance strategy—don’t assume last year’s coverage suffices
Conclusion
2026 is the year to operationalize lessons learned. The legal sector cannot afford reactive security postures. By focusing on governance, compliance, and resilience, firms can safeguard client trust and business continuity.
Focus left of boom to spend less time right of boom.
More Information
Looking for more ways to interact with Kraft Kennedy? We’re out and about and can’t wait to see you!
Check out where our team is headed next, here!